Connecting to the Community — Colleen MacKinnon (UVM)
Key ideas:
- Use of Advisory Board
- Opportunities in fact that EdD candidates tend to be local (versus PhD candidates)
- Use of incentives and rewards for faculty and participating partners
- Use alumni strategically
- Tell stories of EdD projects
NOTES: Advisory Committee/Board Roles
- Superintendents
- Part of business community
- Larger roll-out event — present to the community
- Demonstrate to community that program participants are making a difference
- Need ability to walk into schools and get into data, advisory board members might be able to provide access to data
- Marketing purposes — faculty not sitting in ivory towers disconnected from field
- Use small grants to interact with advisory board members
- Advisory Board might provide suggestions for problems. Program can identify problems that have a workable solution.
- CSU — legislated Advisory Board (18 members)
- Collaborative relationship with program faculty
How do we let neighbors know what we do?
- e.g., Sunday morning television programs
- have mayor come in and do orientation to give window into community
- applicants must to 12 minute presentations
- public education business literacy grants provide connections to multiple fields
- use business/marketing majors to help with “advertising”
How can we sustain relationships over time?
- First need to identify what is special about EdD program
- Problem of localization, at some point might reach saturation
- Look into specialized cohorts to provide program flexibility and adaptability
- Must be engine for change, serving community (branding program), must be relevant
- Community is what is going to sustain program
- Monographs to distribute to community at large
- Call for focus group to review, edit monograph — use prestige as reward
- Food
- Participants must feel that they are making a contribution
- Professional development at local schools. When a student can report on a lab of practice, this helps with confidence.
- Make sure stories are told, e.g., blog
Events
- Orientation
- Ropes course for all participants
- Peer mentoring, 1-year behind
- Alumni association —
- “Top Doc” award for established graduate
- alumni retreats with faculty, alumni give scholarships to students
Use of technologies and other disciplines such as business to help to tell the stories
- Consider use of Twitter, Facebook
- Need help from other disciplines such as graphic designers, marketing majors, etc.
- grad students dedicated to marketing, business savvy,
- hire intern out of business,
- use intro to meriting classes for specific projects
Role of incentives and rewards — this is a problem because many are not doing it
Effective Change Strategies — Sharon Ryan, Rutgers
- Garner resources upfront
- Identify funding opportunities
- Use money to get extra people to do work
- Supportive leadership
- Know what your dean will and will not support
- Provide a plan of action and what you’ll need
- Need a point person —framework of committees
- Communicate, communicate at all levels
- Use a stealth approach
- Know your bottom line
- Know/use some existing things/adjust
- Use current governance structures
- Differentiate between conceptual, developmental, and implantation
- Try and build in time for faculty work together
- Incentives
- Don’t goal set too much
Inquiry — Charol Shakeshaft, VCU
| Format: | Stand alone classes vs. integration throughout |
| Skills: | Ability to do vs. ability to critique |
| Delivery: |
- Classes after work, on Saturday
- Long time periods vs. short
- Teams of teachers—tag-team vs. collaborative
- All decide on all vs. divide up with individual decisions
|
| Core Content: |
- Ability to indentify root problem, problem identification interrogate, framing problems
- Questioning skills: interviews, focus group skills, gathering/listening
- How to find data in schools, how to evaluate usefulness of existing data; data systems that provide the most useful information
- How to find synthesized information/research results; how to evaluate credibility of these synthesis; how to use professional organizations to get evidence
- communicate data in meaningful ways; understand tables, figures, visual, presentation
- Data viewing frameworks: curriculum, credits, technology, gender/race audit logic models, cost effectiveness processes
- program evaluation: methods, how to evaluate in evaluation; how to talk to a “numbers” person, questions to ask.
|
Differentiating EdD — Honorine Nocon, UCD
| | PhD | EdD |
| Dissemination (contributions) | Research, journals, pubs | Conferences, practitioners journal |
| Peer Review (candidate work) | Professors | Professors, practitioners |
| Dissertation -forms, complexity, doc vs. MA | Theorectical, framework, basic/applied research, individual | Applied/practice-based, individual or group |
| Inquiry Different tools not rigor | Producers | Consumers |
| Role of Ed Psych model?? | Yes? | No? |
Quality & Impact — Joan Bissel, CSU
- Redefine and focus on excellence
- Used Flexner Report and transformation of medical education as our model
- Examine preparation of practitioners having broadly based skills and expertise as specialists
- Framed excellence in relation to new models of leadership at the school site (teams).
- Focused on the role of clinical experts and the definition of clinical faculty in the academy
- Reconceptuallize the location (site) of programs into communities with co-location at the university and at the school
- Proposed co-leadership model with particular lens available for decision-making (ie: instructional leaders, equity, technology, etc)
Alternative Capstone — Robert Rueda, USC
Dimensions
| Purpose | Gap in literature vs. gap in practice |
| Approach | Traditional vs. alternative |
| Format | Group vs. individual |
| Product | Five chapters vs. ?? |
| | |
Issues:
- amount of time
- group dynamics
- IRB issues
- Power issues in own setting
- Title -> dissertation vs. ?
- Rubrics/criteria to evaluate
- Status within university and outside
- Behavior, knowledge, stances—we want to capture all three
- High risk when addressing real problems of practice